You are viewing the Initial Version, the most recent version of this dataset.
1 version(s) available
Date of publication: May 30, 2024

Version 1

Date of publication: May 30, 2024

Type of change:

Description:

preview image

Crop production for the Sierra Nevada National Park

by Ricardo Moreno-Llorca

Crop production resulted as the most relevant ecosystem services for Sierra Nevada after conducting a focus-group with local managers. Taking this into account, we quantified the amount of different crop types in Sierra Nevada based on land use and land cover maps. Then we analysed the average crop yield from official statistics for five reference years over a 10-year period for all types of crops, both on irrigated and dry land. The calculation ...(continue reading)

DOI 10.25829/9aca95
Citation
Moreno-Llorca, R. (2024). Crop production for the Sierra Nevada National Park (Version 1) [Dataset]. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research. https://doi.org/10.25829/9aca95

Crop productionSierra Nevada National Park

72
The title of the dataset. Crop production for the Sierra Nevada National Park
The date on which this version of the data was created in YYYY-MM-DD format.
A paragraph describing the dataset.
Hover to see a suggestion for a good description. Allowed:
Crop production resulted as the most relevant ecosystem services for Sierra Nevada after conducting a focus-group with local managers. Taking this into account, we quantified the amount of different crop types in Sierra Nevada based on land use and land cover maps. Then we analysed the average crop yield from official statistics for five reference years over a 10-year period for all types of crops, both on irrigated and dry land. The calculation of yields by crop, area and type of farming (dry and irrigated) was validated by conducting group interviews. Finally, we calculated the total crop production per year (kg/ha/year) in 30 m × 30 m grid cell.
Provide the DOI number of associated publications. Click Plus to add DOIs.

N/A

The method of production of the original data.
Hover to see a suggestion for a minimum description. In order to identify the most relevant ecosystem services in terms of both supply and demand of Sierra Nevada, we organized a focus-group with local managers. The focus-group had the participation of 10 managers. During the focus-group, managers were invited to participate in a questionnaire-based survey. From this questionnaire, crop production resulted as the most relevant ecosystem services, among others.

Based on this result, we quantified the amount of different crop types in the study area from land use and land cover maps for each reference year: 1956, 1977, 1984, 1999 and 2007. Then we analysed the average crop yield from official statistics over a 10-year period for all types of crops, both on irrigated and dry land. To do so, three different regions were distinguished in the study area, given differences in their aspect (north, southeast and southwest), types of human management, and levels of water availability. The calculation of yields by crop, area and type of farming (dry and irrigated) was validated by conducting group interviews with the whole governmental agricultural staff in each area (three technicians in the north, two in the southeast and three in the southwest area). Finally, for each 30 m × 30 m cell, the total crop production per year (kg/ha/year) was calculated.
The name of the Project.
The URL from the project website. https://smartecomountains.lifewatch.dev/en/
The name of the person or other creator type principally responsible for creating this data.
The email of the person or other creator type principally responsible for creating this data. ricuni@gmail.com
ricuni@gmail.com
The names of the co-creators responsible for creating this data. Click Plus to add co-creators.
Select between Creative Commons (CC) or Non-CC license.
Please select the CC license from the list. We recommend the use of CC BY 4.0

Essential Biodiversity Variables

Select the EBV class and the EBV name for the dataset. For cross-cutting use the comment at the bottom of the page for further information.
Genetic composition
Intraspecific genetic diversity
Genetic differentiation
Effective population size
Inbreeding
Other
Species populations
Species distributions
Species abundances
Other
Species traits
Morphology
Physiology
Phenology
Movement
Other
Community composition
Community abundance
Taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity
Trait diversity
Interaction diversity
Other
Ecosystem functioning
Primary productivity
Ecosystem phenology
Ecosystem disturbances
Other
Ecosystem structure
Live cover fraction
Ecosystem distribution
Ecosystem Vertical Profile
Other
Ecosystem services
Pollination
Other
Cross-cutting

Biological entity

Select the entity type of the dataset.
Species
Communities
Ecosystems
Other
None
A description of the range of taxa or ecosystem types addressed in the dataset. E.g. "300 species of mammals”, “Forests”, etc.
The reference as a URL. N/A

Metric

Provide the name, description, units of minimum 1 metric. Click Plus to add metrics.

Scenario

Spatial domain

Global
Continental/Regional
National
Sub-national/Local
Name of the continent/region/country/area, separated by comma
meter
southWest lat: 4084775, lon: 435635
northEast lat: 4123805, lon: 535955

Temporal domain

The targeted time period between each value in the dataset.
decadal
annually
monthly
weekly
daily
Other
Irregular
Single time
Select the temporal extent of the dataset.
When the dataset represents a Single time, then use the same start and end date.
__

Environmental domain *

Terrestrial
Marine
Freshwater
Miscellaneous information about the data, not captured elsewhere. N/A